Professional Leadership Journal – Narcissism and Machiavellianism Assessments

According to Nahavandi (2012), personalities with an elevated tag on the scale are relaxed exploitation several resources to accomplish their individual(a) aims. The Machiavellian (Mach) scale measures an individuals willingness to spue self-interests and his or her preferences above the interests of the meeting and a persons ability to bias and manipulate others for personal gain (Nahavandi, 2012).An individual with a soaring Mach pee-pee tycoon pick up an absence of morality and honesty and both of these are necessities of operative management. As I established the two unalike assessments, I was astonished by my results. I completed the Machiavellianism Assessment first, I scored a 23 and according to the text an sightly score is 24. My score shows that I score within the average range and that I am willing to put my self-interests diversion and operate on as a group to reach a goal.I then completed the Narcissism assessments and scored a 118, which completely shake me, Ive never considered myself a swollen-headed person, but according to this data I am in fact that style. narcissistic people love the idea of having post over people, but I am the total opposite, I would rather be a team player than a leader. But I do have some of the traits that constitute me as a narcissist. As a future existence health leader, my Machiavellianism Assessment should be high and my Narcissism assessment should be low.In whatsoever public health situation organism able to put your self-interests to the side helps to extenuate unwanted stress and it also helps to learn the situation carefully. Nahavandi (2012) states that positive narcissistic leadership may have an exaggerated thought of self and entitlement, but they use their self-confidence, power, and lick to achieve goals, much the same way a moderate Machiavellian would. This seems more(prenominal) like what I strive to do in my life and in my work life.